Skip to content
Layer X
Case StudyPublished 30 May 2026 · Updated 14 Jun 2026

Case Study: Antenna Bracket in AlSi10Mg — 38% Mass Reduction for a Satellite Sub-System

A space sub-system supplier needed a satellite antenna bracket 35%+ lighter than the machined baseline. Topology optimisation + DMLS AlSi10Mg delivered 38% reduction in 3 weeks.

Layer X Team
Layer X Editorial Team
4 min read
Share

Key Takeaways

  • AlSi10Mg antenna bracket printed by DMLS for aerospace.
  • Achieved a 38% weight reduction via redesign.
  • Maintained stiffness and mounting accuracy.
  • Aluminium additive for light, functional metal parts.

The Challenge

A Bengaluru-based satellite sub-system integrator was designing a deployment mechanism bracket for a Ka-band antenna on a small observation satellite. The programme had a strict mass budget: the bracket assembly (bracket + interface fasteners) could not exceed 210 grams. The machined aluminium 6061-T6 baseline design weighed 342 grams — 63% over budget.

The team had explored conventional lightweighting approaches: pocketing, wall thinning, material removal on non-load-bearing faces. These changes brought the bracket to 285 grams — still 36% over budget and structurally marginal at the thinnest wall sections. They contacted Layer X in Ahmedabad for a topology optimisation and DMLS additive manufacturing assessment.

Technical Requirements

  • Material: Aerospace-grade aluminium, compatible with space environment (thermal cycling −60°C to +120°C, vacuum outgassing)
  • Structural: 5g quasi-static launch load, 50g shock, 20–2000 Hz random vibration per ECSS-E-ST-32 equivalent
  • Target mass: ≤210 g (bracket only, excluding fasteners)
  • Interface: Must accept 6× M4 inserts for antenna deployment mechanism and 4× M5 inserts for satellite panel attachment
  • Surface treatment: Alodine or equivalent for ESD/EMC compliance
  • Certification: Full dimensional report, material test report, hardness certificate

Engineering Approach

Step 1: Load Case Definition and FEA Baseline

Layer X's engineering team built a finite element model in Altair Inspire from the customer's interface envelope drawing. Three load cases were defined: 5g static (launch quasi-static), 50g shock (pyrotechnic separation), and self-weight + inertia under 20–2000 Hz random vibration. The machined 6061-T6 baseline was analysed first to establish stress distribution and identify load-carrying regions — these would be protected in the topology optimisation.

Step 2: Topology Optimisation

Altair Inspire topology optimisation was run with:

  • Design space: full bracket volume minus excluded regions (interface boss areas, M4/M5 clearance zones)
  • Objective: minimise compliance (maximise stiffness) under all three load cases simultaneously
  • Volume constraint: 45% material retention (targeting 154 grams from full-volume 342 gram baseline)
  • Manufacturing constraint: overhang angle ≥ 45° for DMLS printability

The topology optimisation converged in 4 hours on cloud compute, producing a result with 47% volume retention (160 gram equivalent) showing clear load paths — two primary arched ribs connecting the antenna interface to the panel attachment, with organic web geometry between them.

Step 3: Geometry Reconstruction

The raw topology mesh was re-surfaced by the Layer X engineering team into a smooth NURBS body using Fusion 360. Minimum wall thickness was enforced at 0.8 mm (DMLS AlSi10Mg minimum). Radii were added at all stress concentration points. M4 and M5 boss inserts were modelled as cylindrical posts with locking geometry for heat-set insert installation.

The reconstructed model was validated by re-running the FEA on the final geometry — maximum Von Mises stress under all load cases remained below 0.6× yield strength (safety factor > 1.67 on yield). First natural frequency: 847 Hz (above the programme requirement of 100 Hz minimum).

Step 4: DMLS Build and Post-Processing

AlSi10Mg was selected over cast aluminium for its superior specific strength after T6 heat treatment and the ability to achieve complex topology-optimised geometry. Build time: 7.5 hours for two brackets (flight unit + acceptance test unit). Post-processing:

  1. T6 heat treatment (solution anneal 520°C, 1h + artificial age 160°C, 12h)
  2. Support removal and cleanup
  3. CNC machining of all interface faces to drawing tolerances
  4. Chromate conversion coating (Alodine 1200) for ESD/EMC compliance and corrosion protection
  5. CMM inspection — all 22 critical dimensions within drawing tolerance

Results

MetricBaseline (machined Al 6061)DMLS AlSi10Mg (topology optimised)
Mass342 g212 g (38% reduction)
First natural frequency312 Hz847 Hz (+171%)
Max stress (5g quasi-static)128 MPa156 MPa (still within yield limit)
Lead time4 weeks (machining from billet)3 weeks (DfAM + build + post-process)
Cost₹38,000 (machined 6061)₹52,000 (DMLS AlSi10Mg + T6 + Alodine)

The bracket met the 210 gram mass budget (212 grams — 2 grams over, accepted by programme change request), passed all structural qualification tests, and was integrated into the satellite sub-system. The first natural frequency improvement to 847 Hz was a significant structural benefit that also emerged from the topology optimisation.

Key Learnings

For space applications where every gram counts and geometry freedom is the primary design driver, DMLS with topology optimisation delivers results that machining cannot match. The cost premium (37% more expensive than machined 6061) is justified by the 38% mass saving — at ₹50,000–1,00,000 per kilogram of launch cost, saving 130 grams on a satellite structure has a direct ROI in the tens of thousands of dollars.

Contact Layer X for aerospace-grade DMLS AlSi10Mg parts with DfAM engineering support, material certification, and CMM inspection reports.

Further Reading

Layer X TeamLayer X Editorial Team

Technical content produced by the Layer X manufacturing team — engineers, quality specialists, and process experts with direct, hands-on experience.

Layer X services in this article
DMLS Metal 3D Printing
Start a project

Need a quote for your next project?

Upload your CAD file and get a precision manufacturing quote within 24 hours.

Get a Quote
More from Case Study

Continue reading

Case Study

Case Study: EV Battery Busbar in Copper DMLS — Conductivity, Weight and Thermal Results

Layer X built a pure-copper 3D printed busbar for an EV battery pack in DMLS — conductivity, weight and thermal results with internal cooling channels.

Read article
Case Study

Case Study: FMCG Pilot-Line Bridge Tooling in Aluminium

Aluminium bridge tooling case study: how Layer X delivered a 5,000-shot FMCG pilot line in days, not weeks, at a fraction of the cost of a CNC steel mould.

Read article
Case Study

Case Study: Reverse-Engineering an Obsolete Textile-Machine Gear in PA12 via SLS

How Layer X reverse-engineered an obsolete textile-machine gear for an Ahmedabad mill — 3D-scanned, redesigned in CAD and printed in PA12 nylon via SLS.

Read article